ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

Thứ Sáu, 13 tháng 1, 2023

How US Authorities Could Request for Help on Taking the Evidence in Vietnam for Civil or Commercial Matters?

 How US Authorities Could Request for Help on Taking the Evidence in Vietnam for Civil or Commercial Matters?

The Evidence Collection Convention is a multilateral Hague Conference convention that was signed on March 18, 1970 and went into effect on October 7, 1972. The objective of the Convention is to facilitate the collection of evidence and to harmonize the methods of evidence collection between States.


On May 3, 2020, Vietnam became a party to the Convention on the Collection of Evidence Abroad. After becoming a member of this Convention, Vietnam only applies and accepts requests for evidence collection by a written request as described in Chapter I of this Convention. As a result, Vietnam does not use the process of gathering evidence carried out by a diplomatic officer, consular officer, or authorized person in Chapter II of the Convention.

Procedures for collecting evidence between the United States and Vietnam under the Hague Convention

Both Vietnam and the United States are parties to the Convention on Collection of Evidence. However, since Vietnam only participates in collecting evidence in writing, the United States has to collect evidence in Vietnam via this method.

Step 1: The U.S. Agency sends a written request to collect evidence to the Ministry of Justice of Vietnam

In the settling a case involving a civil or commercial field, the party can request the Court to assist in collecting evidence in Vietnam. The US judicial agency will issue a written request for evidence collection to the competent Vietnamese agency (specifically, the Ministry of Justice). This document must ensure that follow the contents of Article 3 of the Convention, and must be written in Vietnamese or accompanied by a Vietnamese translation and delivered via postal service.

Step 2: A written request for evidence collection is received by Vietnam’s Ministry of Justice

The Ministry of Justice of Vietnam will receive the request for evidence and decide whether or not to comply with the request for evidence collection. In the event of a refusal, the Ministry of Justice of Vietnam must clearly state the reasons specified in Article 12 of this Convention. For example, the request is not within the scope of the Convention in the civil and commercial fields, or the implementation of which may be detrimental to the sovereignty and security of that country, etc.

Step 3: The Ministry of Justice requests competent agencies to collect evidence

After having sufficient grounds to handle the request of the U.S. Agency, the Department of Justice will send a written acceptance of the request to collect evidence to the United States and forward it to the competent domestic agency for collection evidence process. The Vietnam agency will notify the U.S. Agency of the time, place, and procedures to collect evidence to be followed so that relevant parties and their representatives can be present.

When making the written request, a judicial officer from a U.S. agency may be present, and this presence has to be approved by the Vietnam Agency. Further, according to Article 11 of this Convention, the person being asked to provide evidence has the right to refuse to comply with the request for evidence collection if required by Vietnam law or  in the written request for evidence collection state that they can refuse to provide evidence expressly stated.

Step 4: The Ministry of Justice of Vietnam sends a written response on the results of evidence collection to the U.S. Agency

After receiving the results of evidence collection from other agencies, the Ministry of Justice sends a written response to the results of evidence collection to the U.S. Agency to compete the process.

To comply with the process and ensure the evidence could be properly collected for usage in trial, it is important to consult with dispute lawyers in Vietnam for legal advice.

ANT Lawyers, as a law firm in Vietnam, will always follows up the evidence in Vietnam for civil or commercial matters to update clients on regular basis.

Source: ANT Lawyers.vn

Thứ Năm, 12 tháng 1, 2023

Trade and Customs in Vietnam

 Navigating the modern environment of international business requires companies that engage in the exchange of goods and services across international borders to be ever vigilant in addressing customs and import controls laws, including those related to border and supply chain security. ANT Lawyers trade and customs practice works to ensure and optimize our clients’ cost- and time-efficient shipment of goods and services across borders, within the confines of the law.


Customs Lawyers in Vietnam

We represent clients who engage in such diverse fields as:

-Customs brokerage, express delivery, freight forwarding, logistics and sea and rail transportation

-Apparel, beverages, consumer electronics, cosmetics, food products, footwear, home furnishings, luxury goods and paper products.

Businesses often overlook the fundamental importance of accurate tariff classification and appraisement as sources of potential duty savings and necessary compliance for imported products. These are the “nuts and bolts” of any sophisticated customs and import controls practice, and our Customs lawyers in Vietnam are well versed in this complex body of law to maximize duty savings and minimize customs penalties.

ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam with customs lawyers in Vietnam always follow up customs cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

Source: ANT Lawyers.vn


Thứ Ba, 3 tháng 1, 2023

How to Distinguish between Deposit and Advance Payment?

In commercial transactions, it is very common for one party to give the other party an amount of money before the contract being performed. Should this amount be considered as deposit or advance payment?

How to Distinguish between Deposit and Advance Payment

 Deposit is one of security measures for the performance of contract obligations. According to regulation of Civil Code 2015, deposit is an act whereby one party (hereinafter referred to as the depositor) gives to other party (hereinafter referred to as the depositary) a sum of money or precious metals, gemstones or other valuable things (hereinafter referred to as the deposited property) for a period of time as security for the entering into or performance of a contract.

Upon a contract being entered into or performed, any deposited property shall be returned to the depositor, or deducted from the amount of payment obligation. If the depositor refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the deposited property shall belong to the depositary. In case the depositary refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the depositary must return the deposited property and pay an amount equivalent to the value of the deposited property to the depositor, unless otherwise agreed.

It can be seen that the purpose of deposit is to ensure the entering into or performance of a contract. Due to the fact that its nature is a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, sanction is set in regulation of deposit in case one party refuses to perform the agreement.

In practice, the advance payment can be understood that the obligor pays the obligee a sum of money in advance and this amount is regarded as in-advance performance of a payment obligation. As the nature of the advance is not a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, there is no fine rising from the advance if one party refuses to perform the agreement. Further, when a contracting party gives to the other party a sum of money, which is not clearly identified by the parties as a deposit or an advance, such amount shall be considered an advance payment.

It is important to distinguish the difference between deposit and advance payment to avoid potential disputes in performance the contract or consult with dispute resolution lawyers in Vietnam at early stage of the dispute for proper actions.

ANT Lawyers, as a reliable law firm in Vietnam, we focus on providing possible solutions that best meet the needs of legal and business clients. We help customers achieve their goals while protecting their interests, minimizing risks, and complying with the law.